Welcome back fellow language enthusiasts!
I just realized. I haven’t posted anything since last year! ba
dum tss. Since I wrote last, my understanding of the English language has
furthered progressed, as in my figurative, linguistic pilgrimage, I travelled
through the darkest regions of the Internet to discover the appropriate and
correct ways to use a comma. Upon stumbling the cleverly titled “Comma Sutra,”
I have become well acquainted with the grammatical tool and am now as well
equipped with it in the same way Indiana Jones is with a whip.
Remembering the traditions of this hallowed archive. It is
time for the first WOW word of the year, which in my opinion is quite a fun one
to say. The word, “ubiquitous” describes something that is present everywhere.
An example of this would be, Joshua’s ubiquitous
writings were celebrated around the world!
Now this task was prefaced with a formal tone, therefore
from this word on the tone of this post will have transitioned from colloquial
to proper.
Recently in class, we read an article published by Times
magazine titled, Back to Babel. A
coherent theme throughout the article was the precedence language takes in
defining a culture as well as the detrimental effects that can, and have
occurred when one has “died.” The question posed to us in regards to this was: What is the value of preserving indigenous
languages? An equivocal question, my thoughts in regards to this matter are
ambivalent, as I both recognize the positive virtues brought forth from the
preservation of indigenous languages while maintaining the belief of their
preservation being not entirely obligatory.
Indigenous languages are very esoteric. In the case of
aboriginal languages, the rich vocabulary is centric to describing the natural
world. Many of these words, which may be considered idioms in the English
language, are specialized. So in this way the value of preserving these
indigenous dialects are rooted in their arcane applications that though
extraneous to much of the modern world, are intrinsic to that people’s way of
life, and an inherent part of their culture. Additionally, indigenous languages
provide increased diversity, promoting rich cultural diversity, being ubiquitous
in traditions, art and other autonomous-routine activities. A loss of this
would surely affect a culture’s rich heritage but in my opinion an innocuous
effect.
Indigenous languages in my opinion are not a quintessential
part of a culture but instead an accessory of it. A supplement, that as
mentioned, provides further depth and allows for a greater heritage. A loss of
this would not mark the end of a culture or even a people but instead a facet
of which was no longer relevant. Progression is an intrinsic part of society,
Latin, a now dead language inspired many other languages, but the end of it did
not have detrimental affects on the respective cultures it was apart of.
Relating back to the concept of cultures, cultures are multifaceted and are
composed of many aspects, with each being pertinent to the other but at the
same not inextricable. Traditions and ways of life can continue without the
integrity of their heritage being impinged upon, but instead developed and
progressed in a way that is sustainable for the future.
As always, your blog posts are always an enjoyable read. My favorite part of your blog post is the last paragraph in which you told the readers what your view on this topic is. Well done Josh! keep up the good work.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteIt truly is a very subjective and ambiguous question. I greatly revere the approach you have taken to answer this question. Many tend to make a bold statement by saying that language is in fact culture. I found it interesting how you indicated that it is merely an accessory of culture.
ReplyDelete